Meghan Markle hid Prince Harry's auctioning of Princess Diana's gold Cartier watch is a false and unsubstantiated claim. There is no evidence to support this claim, and it is not credible.
The claim appears to have originated from a misunderstanding of how the auction process works. When an item is auctioned, the seller is not required to disclose the identity of the buyer. This is to protect the privacy of the buyer.
.jpg)
In the case of Prince Harry's watch, the buyer's identity was not disclosed. This led to speculation that Meghan Markle had hidden the identity of the buyer in order to protect her husband. However, there is no evidence to support this claim.
It is more likely that the buyer's identity was not disclosed because the buyer wished to remain anonymous. This is not uncommon in high-profile auctions.
The claim that Meghan Markle's PR team gave Lili £5000 gift to reduce scrutiny is also a false and unsubstantiated claim. There is no evidence to support this claim, and it is not credible.
The claim appears to have originated from a misunderstanding of how public relations works. Public relations teams often give gifts to journalists and other media figures in order to build relationships and get positive coverage. However, there is no evidence that Meghan Markle's PR team gave Lili £5000 gift to reduce scrutiny.
It is more likely that the gift was given for another reason, such as to thank the journalist for their coverage.
The claims that Meghan Markle hid Prince Harry's auctioning of Princess Diana's gold Cartier watch and that her PR team gave Lili £5000 gift to reduce scrutiny are both false and unsubstantiated. There is no evidence to support either claim, and they are not credible.